Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Double Deckers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

American Double Deckers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable company, appears to be more of a service agent than manufacturer of buses. Fails WP:GNG. Nordic  Dragon  14:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Dragon  14:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as this is a local somewhat newly founded company with only the expected company information, nothing else to even minimally suggest better for the companies and organizations notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:44, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article provides no independent reliable sources.-- danntm T C 00:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I could not find independent and reliable sources. If they will be added later I am willing to review. Creating the article again is also an option, if the company gets better noticed in the future. gidonb (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single news article or otherwise reliable source. Elaenia (talk) 06:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.