Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Heraldry Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

American Heraldry Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This heraldry hobbyist club has couched itself in very aggrandizing terminology in its self-authored WP article (see: "learned society"). The article has only one reference which "alludes" to the society's existence but doesn't mention it by name. It has had a citations tag on it for 5 years and the situation still has not remedied. A search of Google News find two references since 2012, both incidental, and a search of Google Books none. I've looked-up the organization in the index of two offline heraldry books I own and can find no reference to it in either. The organization's own website seems to indicate it's simply a message board. According to it, it was founded a decade or so ago, briefly sponsored a few awards, journals and other minor activities, but appears to have burned out and is now just a semi-active message board. Semi-active message boards do not meet our GNG. BlueSalix (talk) 04:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing anything but passing mentions in Google Books. As the article doesn't show any references suggesting any coverage of the topic, I say delete per failure of WP:NORG and WP:V. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. I found the article interesting and would like to keep it. Although it's been around since 2005 there are insufficient references and coverage to justify keeping. Perhaps keep a REDIRECT to United States heraldry where it is mentioned - although that mention is also without a reference. MB (talk) 01:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete & Redirect - The references I could find in news here and here are passing mentions that in no way render notability. A redirect to United_States_heraldry would be better. Mwenzangu (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.