Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Hot Rod Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The concerns about copyright violations are the biggest concern, so I have no concern about re-creating (possibly in draft space) if the next revision is free of copyvio. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

American Hot Rod Association

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Close paraphrase from https://ahraonline.com/about/, doesn't seem notable at all and is basically a magazine article. Noah 💬 13:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * keep Better wp:before expected to decide notability. copyrighted materials should be removed on site. But the organization seems notable, some silent films in 1960 and these references, , , are enough to establish notability of a 70 years old organization. Chirota (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Page only has one source included and it is a primary source. agree this is non notable. Redoryxx (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. References appear to be primary or from closely-related sources (including a Facebook page, absolutely amazing). AdoTang (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable for inclusion. Riteboke (talk) 08:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment maybe this should be deleted as a copyvio, or per TNT, but there's no way this isn't notable, and the lack of WP:BEFORE in many of the above arguments is appalling. The amount of material available to build an article is staggering, just from Google Books and newspapers.com.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.