Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Luxury Limousine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

American Luxury Limousine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Appears an attempt at using Wikipedia for free advertising. No depth of coverage in independent sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep It's been widely covered in local newspapers. It's no reason to delete the largest limo company in the second largest U.S. city. I'm willing to remove the gallery or clean it up if necessary. Bazzy11 (talk) 23:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC) — Bazzy11 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * See WP:CORP. Local coverage is not sufficient for establishing notability. We need sources of national or at least regional scope. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Absolutely keep This article should change, but it shouldn't be deleted all together. Someone needs to find better sources. $\mathbb{N}$iceley 23:25, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That would be a reasonable argument if better sources could be found. I tried and could not find anything more than local coverage. Have you? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * But there must be sources! If you can find them, do share. Oleaster (talk·contribs) 00:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Absolutely delete due to lack of evidence of notability as required by WP:CORP and WP:SIGCOV, but willing to change my view if someone can find a couple of good sources. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with deletion - Trivial or incidental coverage so far from sources that reprint press releases or other industry promotion. Nothing notable about this company. They do not supply a street address. They appear to be in the City of Thousand Oaks portion of Westlake Village (neighborhood) and not in the City of Westlake Village. Fettlemap (talk) 00:22, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. There doesn't seem to be anything out there other than ads, listings, and their own press releases. Nothing that comes close to satisfying WP:GNG. Oleaster (talk·contribs) 00:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GNG - Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Also, I consider 18 employees and 1.2 million revenue on the low side, so I really want to see more reliable sources for this particular topic. - Taketa (talk) 06:18, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOTPROMO. Furthermore I have not found significant coverage of the subject in multiple non-primary or secondary reliable sources. Therefore the subject also fails WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.