Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American McGee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep as article is clearly notable, no need to let the nomination run its course. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

American McGee

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet relevant notability criteria. The article reads like an autobiography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skelevixy (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Skelevixy (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC) Skelevixy (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 30.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Software, China,  and Texas.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Obvious Keep. Am McGee is clearly notable from the available sourcing. Now whether it is written as an autobiography or has had self-promotion/COI editing, that's aspects to be fixed, but there's zero question about Am McGee's notability within the video game industry. (note that the nominator is a relatively new editor so may not be aware of the rules here). --M asem (t) 12:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of sourcing exists in the article as it is, and his creation of works such as American McGee's Alice means that he meets notability guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 13:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: per GNG (sources in article) and point three in WP:ARTIST "played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work"  Just ' i ' yaya  14:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep it is a notable person, however they does seem to be some self-promotion. Still not a reason to delete. Gabe114 (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.