Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Motor Scooter Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

American Motor Scooter Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable trade association lacking coverage in reliable sources. PROD was deleted with the remover stating, "the group has existed for 50 years and is not huge on the internet but is one of the most well-known groups in the scooter industry; they even sell shirts with the AMSA logo". Meatsgains (talk) 03:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Trade association lacking notability. Meatsgains (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - if this organization is that notable, they shouldn't have problem with meeting notability like the ghits proved such as the links to the 1963 articles of American Motorcycling but the main problem is that they could do better than this article, bearing in mind with a single line article, there is nothing to lose out there, so a recreation is advisable. Donnie Park (talk) 17:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Basically nothing here and includes the companies and organizations notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.