Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Nihilist Underground Society (6th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  20:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

American Nihilist Underground Society
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Clearly this article has been through a number of previous AfD discussions, with varying results (one straight delete, one straight keep, two no consensus results and a speedy based on a nomination within five days of the previous AfD). The article is sourced at present, but nothing is presented to establish notability per WP:WEB. The closest candidate would be the award from the Houston Press for Best Nihilist Web Site, but as this has only ever been awarded once (the paper appears to make up wacky awards each year) it can hardly be described as "well-known" (per criterion 2 of WP:WEB). The rest are trivial mentions that suggest various actions have been rumoured to be associated with said website, and a couple of interviews with a co-creator of the site by online sites that are not giving any non-trivial background to the site itself. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I think I may have messed up this nomination somehow, but unsure how; any admin help would be gratefully appreciated... Blackmetalbaz (talk) 18:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I fixed it. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Blackmetalbaz (talk) 19:01, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Delete, basically per nom. Apart from the Houston Press award (which seemed to have been meant as a humorous gig) and a little bit of minor newscoverage, there does not appear to be much else here. Does not seem to pass WP:WEB based on the sources available. Nsk92 (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, changing to plain delete. Nsk92 (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

delete not notable. Surprised it survived this long. Sticky Parkin 20:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB and WP:ORG and WP:N and WP:V and WP:RS and pretty much everything else. I remember this getting quite rightly deleted ages ago but apparently it came back at some point. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.