Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Patriot Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Johnleemk | Talk 10:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

American Patriot Party
Although Google hits are substantial, the results are muddled by entities other than this "party" founded in 2003. A search of 600+ American newspaper archives from 2003 to present shows 3 results. 2 are in passing reference as part of a list of third parties. 1 cites the website for historical info on the revolutionary war. There is no evidence of campaigning or any political activities. Probably 1 man and a P.O. box. delete

Comment That is your offhand opinion. "Probably"? You are speculating. --Fahrenheit451 02:23, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I guess you are the only member? confirmed? Lotsofissues 21:05, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Lotsofissues 17:16, 3 December 2005 (UTC) CommentYou are acting on the opinion of one person who runs a so-called "third party" website as truth?--Fahrenheit451 02:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC) Keep This is an extant U.S. political party.--Fahrenheit451 02:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The "2006 candidates" section contains 1 person, which they endorse: Independent candidate Brian Lee Merrill from 1st District, SC who is running for Congress. The state party section indicates that a state chapter has only been formed so far, in Florida. But apparently more are forming at the moment. The national committee reportedly consists of three people. Punkmorten 19:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment The Florida party isn't functioning very well, according to . There is a website for the Oregon Patriot Party . --  Dalbury ( Talk )  18:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Jtmichcock 02:42, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep; of marginal notability, but I prefer to err in the direction of inclusionism. *Dan T.* 18:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete So this one has enough to close with a consensus, definately not notable, unless starting a political party consisting of single digit membership is worthwhile, in which case I say we here start the "American Patriot Party AfD Voters Party", and our main platform can be that everyone should vote to keep or delete this article. karmafist 19:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks pretty insubstantial so far. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  18:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Argument for delete not clear. -- JJay 05:26, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of verifiability. Friday (talk) 21:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.