Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Polarity Therapy Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

American Polarity Therapy Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

References provide only passing mention of the organization and are mostly about polarity therapy, not the organization. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGCRITE. Search finds nothing better. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC) Hi Mccapra. Hope you are doing well. Thanks for your inputs on this article. However it is the only Organisation globally certifying members as therapists in Polarity and hence I feel the nomination for deletion for this article is not correct. I request this article could stay for public interest and making Wikipedia a good informational platform. Kindly suggest. Thanks. Gardenkur (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations,  and Medicine. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don’t see anything to suggest this is notable, so it fails WP:NORG. Mccapra (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi in order to demonstrate notability we need sustained in-depth coverage of the topic in reliable independent sources. I can’t find that - can you? Mccapra (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi Mccapra. Thanks for your reply. I understand it doesnt have substantial coverage. However the theraphy certified by it is widely recognised. For the informational sources based on that cant we include the organisation supporting it. Gardenkur (talk) 07:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Quick delete. I have filed an AfD for polarity therapy itself, which I do not consider notable. Nor is its 'professional association' notable by the same criteria.Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.