Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont 11:32, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

American Road

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Advert, NN Toddstreat1 23:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Torc2 00:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, reads like a publisher placed advertisement. Wildhartlivie 04:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability, AGF edit but smacks of advertising. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 23:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Still smacks of advertising! Have a look at WP:N. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry 01:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Modifications have been made - attempting to use the Wikipedia guidelines. Other suggestions are welcome. Thanks,Rebeccalrepp —Preceding comment was added at 23:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I made some fixes, and added a conflict tag due to Rebeccalrepp, an editor of the magazine, editing the article. Bearian 22:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been listed on the talk page for WikiProject Journalism.-- User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The input in favor of deletion emphasizes content matters, which are not suitable rationale for deletion per se. I've placed on the article talk page two secondary sources, one of which I consider reliable, which focus on the magazine.  The References in the article itself which are not self-referential are not sufficient as secondary sources as they do not report information on the magazine as the primary topic.  My 'weak keep' is based on the single in-depth magazine review found.  (see permalink of my talk page contribution). --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the magazine is not a primary subject of most of the sources so they remain insufficient to meet WP:N. Eluchil404 07:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.