Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Samoa's results and fixtures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus but leaning towards delete or merge. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 05:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

American Samoa's results and fixtures
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unmaintained (and probably unmaintainable) list of fixtures of result. Per WP:NOT and previous and current consensus on Articles for deletion/Papua New Guinea fixtures and results and Articles for deletion/Denmark national football team season 2006 Angelo (talk) 12:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating for the same reason the following articles (all of them being created by the same user, by the way):
 * Venezuela fixtures and results
 * Barbados fixtures and results
 * Bahamas fixtures and results
 * Belize fixtures and results
 * Bermuda fixtures and results
 * Solomon Islands fixtures and results
 * Fiji results and fixtures

--Angelo (talk) 12:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Angelo (talk) 12:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  12:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge all back to the articles about the individual national teams, and then delete and salt. The adage, "Wikipedia is not a sports page" applies here.  Since friendly matches and qualifying ones don't happen every week, merge shouldn't be that difficult a task.  Mandsford (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A potentially endless fixture list is not what I would expect from an encyclopaedia. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 05:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unencyclopedic, no merge as more statistics/trivia lists are not what the national team articles need. Punkmorten (talk) 06:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge to national team's main article. GiantSnowman (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep all. They might not have much in there. But they can be expanded and as per my vote on Articles for deletion/Papua New Guinea fixtures and results keep. Peanut4 (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep all - encyclopaedic and makes sense to keep this detail out of the main articles. TerriersFan (talk) 02:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep all except Bahamas; delete Bahamas These should have been considered individually as the two in the nomination were. Since 1 of the two examples was kept and 1 deleted I don't see how the nominator claims a consensus. The Bahamas page should be deleted since it contains no dates and thus is not encyclopedic. The alternative of merging into the main articles has some merit but that is a matter for separate editorial action. BTW 'delete and merge' is not actually an option; if we merge then the history needs to be kept with a redirect as I understand it. Finally, I don't agree with the grounds of the nomination; these are not 'long and sprawling' lists and they do include context. BlueValour (talk) 20:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, what Mandsford said. Except I wouldn't go as far to salt, just change these into (possibly locked if recreation is a issue) redirects.--Him and a dog 19:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.