Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Vegetarian Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:18, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

American Vegetarian Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization. EDIT: organization completely non-notable except for a single event (certifying Taco Bell menu items). COI article creator. When I'd removed a single bare mention and information about a previous completely unrelated organization by the same name, there was nothing left. valereee (talk) 15:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:18, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I'm going through all the news mentions of Taco Bell, and the articles seem to be bare mentions in articles about a new marketing strategy by Taco Bell. Is it possible sheer number of bare mentions could raise this to notability? --valereee (talk) 15:21, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Alternative: Merge to Vegetarianism in the United States (if no such article, ought to be done). Hyperbolick (talk) 21:16, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment As is this page would be a speedy deletion since the only reference is a link to their linkedin page which was written by them. I havent done the research but whoever created the page needs to do a lot more work before this page should even be considered as a keep. I would give them 3 days to ammend the page with proper references if they have them available. Perhaps someone can direct the creator to a page detailing how to properly source information. ScienceAdvisor (talk) 21:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I concur with ScienceAdvisor. If the article starter wants to keep the article some further research is needed. I am not inclined to undertake. If the article is improved to show GNG I would vote keep.  Lubbad85   (☎) 13:11, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:ORGSIG "If the individual organization has received no or very little notice from independent sources, then it is not notable" - Epinoia (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.