Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American nationalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Redirect Tally Reasoning on Talk Page Karmafist 08:28, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

American nationalism

 * Anonymous vote Somebody's POV rant. Has no place on Wikipedia.
 * Keep I created this article, and I vote keep because it is a notable topic. Many other countries have articles like Countryname nationalism, so I don't see how America would be an exception. --Revolución (talk) 22:55, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There might well be a place for a non-POV article on this subject. This isn't one. Tonywalton | Talk 23:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC) (not, by the way, an American, politically or geographically)
 * Delete. I hate Republicans too, but that is no excuse for a poorly written, biased, inflamatory article that doesn't actually say anything at all about American nationalism. linas 23:56, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or we'll have to create similar articles for national movements in all countries of the world, each of them consisting of a mere list of political parties... Alensha 23:59, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV rant and redirect to Nationalism in the United States (which needs work btw) Gazpacho 00:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gazpacho with no need for a merge. ESkog 01:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gazpacho. There is nothing to merge because the article under discussion is a POV rant. --Metropolitan90 01:12, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect, agree with Gazpacho. TomTheHand 02:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gaspacho. --Deadsalmon 03:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gazpacho. Jkelly 04:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gazpacho. NickBush24 05:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per Gazpacho, looking through the history more closely I don't see why it needs to be deleted. --Apyule 07:13, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good topic.  Bad article.  Logophile 15:38, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I was away from Wikipedia for a while so I didn't have the chance to revert any vandalism. I come back and check the history and vandals were putting all sorts of nonsense on it. This is an encyclopedic topic. Maybe my POV was too biased, but I was willing to make the article better. I would suggest the next time somebody has a problem with the POV to just discuss it on the talk page, something which wasn't done so people need to follow the procedure next time. I didn't even know there was already an article for it, so just redirect it there. --Revolución (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't forget to strikeout your prior vote. Deadsalmon 04:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Revolución and Apyule.--Kewp (t) 06:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.