Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American political commentators


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

American political commentators

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Restored from an expired prod deletion, which had the reason given "unannotated list, unnecessary with categories, fails WP:BLP", which is all still true. We shouldn't create lists of people in potentially controversial categories without a single reference. And the article should stand on it's own, so there may be references that can be pulled from the individual's articles. However, as I'm semi-involved I'm abstaining Steve (Stephen)talk 02:52, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unnecessary list -- we already have plenty of categories to cover this list's content; therefore, the list is redundant. The lack of annotations and failure of WP:BLP are only further reasons to delete the list. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 03:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Unmaintainable. And separating by liberal or conservative is asking for trouble. - Richfife 04:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, potentially huge, made redundant by categories and also has BLP issues Hut 8.5 08:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unmainatainable, and unclear as to purpose. Political commentators who are American, or commentators on American politics? Emeraude 12:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete subjective and unreferenced --Docg 18:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.