Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amey Pandya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Fritzpoll (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Amey Pandya

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Child actor with no reliable sources indicating notability. Only sources given are an IMDB page and the person's own website. Even if all of the claims on the article can be supported using reliable third party sources the individual would not have had a career significant enough for a Wikipedia article at this time, as significant roles in significant productions are required. Was prodded, but prod was removed by an editor with a long history of removing prods for no justification. DreamGuy (talk) 19:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable actor lacking references to support notability. Awards not supported via Google available hits.  ttonyb1 (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Sc straker (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep at least one reference supports the awards and the kid's own website points to several reliable sources that discuss him.  - Mgm|(talk) 00:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll tackle this article tomorrow if enough of the sources are in English. Anyone who wants to help is welcome. (Side note: I'm trying to get a WikiProject Children off the ground. I'd like to ask anyone who is interested in that to visit WikiProject Council/Proposals) - Mgm|(talk) 00:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - The references in the actor's website are not valid URL's and the reference to the ABBY award in is not valid - see ABBY 2006 results for the actual winners. ttonyb1 (talk) 03:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not saying anyone should use the actor's website directly. But by dropping the titles and publication names with dates in LexisNexis for example, it is possible to get the actual published article and verify it. As for the awards. It could easily be a mixup. A couple of days ago (in 2009) I saw someone win a 2008 award. It could simply be a naming thing gone wrong. - Mgm|(talk) 08:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, he's enough of a star to be chosen as part of a jury panel. His film and tv roles are harder to judge because I have no indication of the importance of said roles. The English spelling and grammar errors in the Indian media aren't helping. As for the ABBY. It appears that the ad won it and not him specifically. I'll be looking into the other award mentions. - Mgm|(talk) 08:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have found atleast one source other then IMDB and his own website for a dance competition he was in last year. I will look for more sources. Deavenger (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Has appeared in many films, TV commercials, television series, and reality show. Links added to the article.--Ekabhishek (talk) 05:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 05:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * STRONG KEEP if he was an american/hollywood child actor, we would not be having this debate quite possibly be having this debate, but the page would almost certainly end up being kept.. he has a respectable credit list, he's on imdb, if you google his name, you get credible results for him on web, image, and video searches.  he's known in the community of people who follow bollywood films.  deleting would be a STRONG CULTURAL BIAS, there are a very large number of wikip articles about minor english-speaking actors, who worked in the USA and/or the UK (& yes i know about the perils of justifying one wikip article's existence with the existence of another, but the point is fair in this case:  wikip has a policy of allowing articles on relatively minor actors; in practice, that policy is biased in favour of english-speaking performers who work in western countries, then non-english speaking actors/artists in developed, "western" countries, then the "3rd world"; compare the amount of material english wikip has on hollywood and bollywood. there is an order-of-magnitude difference)  either we allow articles on minor actors/performers, or we don't. if we do, then KEEP. if we don't, then i know a few dozen afd's right now, same justification.  i have even edited on a few of them  :P  Lx 121 (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * follow-up: did anybody  cross-check on say, the hindi wikip (or other south asian & area languages)?  i can't read the script(s), but if somebody who can would do so, it would be germane to this discussion to know if the subject is covered on other language wikip's, especially those for indian/southasian languages.  it would also be nice to have the language links on the article itself Lx 121 (talk) 01:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete no evidence of notability - the article sources provide little more than guff. Eusebeus (talk) 18:04, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.