Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ami Lustig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Ami Lustig

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N, and looks mostly promotional. Nudve (talk) 06:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with nominator, no assertion of notability, or of any particular achievements to explore notability from. ThuranX (talk) 07:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:BIO, lack of substantial coverage in secondary sources. — Snigbrook 11:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article claims numerous books, these would all appear to be due to his editorship of the publication of the Elevcon congress papers (ie not his presentations). The article claims publication of papers, Google scholar comes up with his name on only one site in Japanese.  If he is publishing, Google scholar does not know about it and no-one is citing him.  In short, no verifiable notability.  There is nothing in the article that indicates he has published anything notable, and since the article appears to be self-created, I would presume he would have put it in if it existed.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  01:51, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.