Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amia Srinivasan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Amia Srinivasan

 * Delete I agree that this is WP:TOOSOON. Shows good potential for future notability but at the moment probably a case of young scholar seeking to boost profile with wiki entry. No books or notable works yet published. GScholar rate too low as yet.
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF and subsequently WP:BIO. GScholar hit rate is perhaps too low. Big things in the future? Definitely a case of WP:TOOSOON, but could be wrong. scope_creep (talk) 21:29, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the notion that this is WP:TOOSOON. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 22:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree with Too soon. Top credentials from Ivy League, but needs to expand accomplishments in field. Knox490 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON — usernamekiran [talk]   09:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON for the present. --Artene50 (talk) 20:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete her accomplishments do not yet rise to the level of being a notable scholar.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.