Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amikeca Reto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Procedural close: although these articles have a common theme, the nature of their subjects differ so that they are not a suitable group for bundling together - see WP:BUNDLE - because the arguments concerning their notability are likely to differ, so that a single discussion will become confused. Please raise separate AfDs. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Amikeca Reto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. EnlightenmentAchievedAgain (talk) 09:37, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm also nominating the following related articles for the same reason:

EnlightenmentAchievedAgain (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think these articles should be nominated separately. Some of them, like the Akademio de Esperanto, look like obvious keeps to me. Others, like the Kurso de Esperanto, will take more research to verify whether or not they fail WP:GNG. Having these as a joint nomination will make things confusing for the borderline cases here. Would you like me to separate the nominations for you? It won't be too much trouble. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that the Pasporta Servo is sufficiently notable that it should not be deleted: as the article mentions, it is the second most essential publication, next to the Plena Ilustrita Vortaro. It is an essential part of Esperanto culture. --Wh44 4:08 PM 27 November 2012 (UTC)

This is five different questions, and should be the subject of five different discussions. It is hard to assume good faith when such obvious speedy keeps as the Akademio are on this list. Since I'm a known Esperantist, I ask that some non-involved admin close this nomination immediately, then suggest to EAA that he/she start five separate discussions. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:36, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.