Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amil Imani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ck lostsword•T•C 00:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Amil Imani

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As has been discussed on the article's talk page, this guy isn't really notable enough for Wikipedia. WP:FRINGE applies here, as his views definitely qualify as fringe views, and it is definitely undue weight to give him an article. I have to do this through AFD because the proposed deletion, which was seconded by another user, was invalid because the page's author, User:Patchouli, removed the 'prod' tag earlier, and no exception was made to allow the prod go through even after 5 days. Anyway the guy is still not notable and hence the article should be deleted. The Behnam 06:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Delete WP:Fringe or not, this guy fails WP:Notability by a wide margin. VanTucky 06:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Dazz |Talk 07:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I dunno... I see 90K Ghits for him... A lot of people seem to be listening to what he has to say. -- Groggy Dice T | C 00:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This was discussed already on the talk page. Fringe, hate sites and bloggish stuff, mainly.  He also appears on some sites where people can submit their writing for posting.  But I don't see much mainstream RS about him to make him notable, and we are also not supposed to place undue weight on fringe views & activists.  If the fact that he features prominently on anti-Islamic fringe sites doesn't convince you that he is fringe, I suggest that you read this rant.  It doesn't even come close to being mainstream.  The Behnam 01:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Doesn't need "much," just enough, & our definition is enough=2. DGG 00:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Should I say "any" instead? I don't like pretending to know everything so I don't say "any" just in case there is something really big that I have missed. The Behnam 05:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 05:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 18:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per The Behnam. No reliable sources about him and Google News hits only show articles by him. Not notable by a longshot.--Ispy1981 21:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.