Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amilahawa Chowk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. as unverifiable &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Amilahawa Chowk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unverifiable, not one source confirming the existence of Amilahawa Chowk could be found Fram (talk) 14:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  14:21, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of existence let alone notability Spiderone  10:55, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I think whoever created the article probably entered the name incorrectly. The term "chowk" means a crossroad or intersection.   However, there does seem to be a place called Amilahawa in Sirsa, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. In fact, this website  seems to have a village name called "Amilahawa". --DreamLinker (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, I just found more references to a place called "Amilahawa Chauraha" which means Amilahawa intersection. (The words Chauraha and Chowk are used interchangeably in Hindi). Let me look for more.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * This is weird, but it seems the rural water website doesn't seem the list the supposed village name. There are similarly named villages, but they are in other states. I am coming up at dead ends.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as I have given up on searching. Either this is a small locality (and likely just an intersection) or we have the name wrong. In any case, the page has hardly any information, so I don't think we are losing much.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.