Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amin al-Husseini/anti-semitism (temporary)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core des at 00:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Amin al-Husseini/anti-semitism (temporary)


I am not sure why this is in the main article space, but it should not be. Tom Harrison Talk 00:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete no subpages in main space. Danny Lilithborne 01:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Even ignoring reason above, this article would be deleted in a heartbeat after actual creation. -Amarkov babble 01:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - poorly written article in desperate need of wikification that has received little to no attention. As is it is not encyclopedic. wtfunkymonkey 02:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above or move it to talk page of "parent" article. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 03:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Move or Merge —  regardless of its subpage status (which is policy for POV dispute i believe), it has sources. it may be relevant to its parent article, Amin_al-Husseini where it can be merged, or moved to its own space. i dont think the nom provided a reason to delete beyond its location (which is easy to fix :). JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 04:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - neglected draft. MER-C 08:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --Irishpunktom\talk 11:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - This is a test page. Kari Hazzard  ( T  |  C ) 16:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete since there has been no reasonable attempt to merge this since it was moved to this temp page >6 months ago, I'd say there is no reason for the temp page anymore...--Isotope23 17:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I don’t know what to make of this page or what its purpose is. As it stands now it’s POV and violates article names guild lines and probably topic guide lines. Seano1 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Isotope23. Active POV disputes may use subpages under Talk or User space, but leaving them around is dangerous, and forbidden for article space. --Dhartung | Talk 23:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.