Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Ahmad Nasr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:19, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Amir Ahmad Nasr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

subject fails WP:JOURNALIST due to lack of independent secondary sources on the subject to meet WP:GNG. Being a contributor to a notable newspaper or blog isn't enough to establish notability.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:51, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sudan-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 23:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep As the writer of the article, I disagree with your conclusion. If "being a contributor to a notable newspaper or blog isn't enough to establish notability," what is? He is the author of Sudan's most well-known sociopolitical English-language blog, not just some run-of-the-mill blogger. He is also an author of book that has been covered by multiple reliable secondary sources. Both of these notable facts are covered by secondary sources throughout the internet. What more would you like to see? Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 01:34, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - a quick search turns up in-depth articles about him in Foreign Policy magazine, Wall Street Journal, and the Economist. Seems to me that he meets notability criteria as author and activist. Glendoremus (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Several high end refs, passes GNG. South Nashua (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, strikes me as GNG Chetsford (talk) 06:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.