Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Ali (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Amir Ali (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV from multiple independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let&#39;srun (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, Massachusetts,  and Washington, D.C.. Let&#39;srun (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify: Although he is colloquially notable and has had a very successful legal career, there doesn't appear to be sufficient significant coverage at this point. Since he's currently under consideration for a District Court seat, we should draftify so this doesn't need to be completely rewritten if he's confirmed. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Do not draftify: Amir Ali won major cases at the Supreme Court and was notable enough to have a Wikipedia page BEFORE he became a judicial nominee. It is counter-productive to draftify the Wikipedia page of a judicial nominee who was notable before his nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluthy (talk • contribs) 01:04, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Just because he had an article before his judicial nomination doesn't mean he was actually notable. What sources meet the WP:GNG? Let&#39;srun (talk) 14:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify: as is the procedure for other similar articles. If he's confirmed, he'll certainly be notable enough to have an article. But there's no deadline. Marquardtika (talk) 20:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Draft: Otherwise he's a practicing lawyer. Testifying before Congress doesn't get you an article, and being a lawyer that works at the Supreme Court isn't a slam dunk either. We only have what's an extended resume at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify per WP:TOOSOON and WP:HAMMER; he's not there yet. Bearian (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.