Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Haider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Amir Haider

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Cannot find sources to verify notability per WP:POLITICIAN. See http://news.google.co.in/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=in&hl=en&q="amir+haider"+-khan+-hoti and http://www.google.co.in/search?q="amir+haider"+-khan+-hoti+-dada&hl=en&rlz=1C1_____enIN342IN342&start=0&sa=N. (I'm sorry, I can't link them. Its not working.)  Aditya Ex Machina  09:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Here (scroll down just below the middle) he's mentioned in a section that says: "The state government had not taken any action on the probe report dated June 24, 2008 that had asked for the FIR to be filed against her in the matter. The DIG/SSP officer has now hurriedly dispatched a letter dated March 29, 2010 to the Congress leader Amir Haider who had filed the RTI assuring him of some action on petition as soon as legal opinion is available." Here he's also mentioned. In this source again he's mentioned as a Congress leader from Baribanki. So there are suggestions of notability but more sources would be needed to establish this. Valenciano (talk) 08:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete does not satisfy WP:N, just a politician - No sources indicating him to be an MP or MLA or holdin any other office of importance. Arjun  codename024 20:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.