Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Joy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Amir Joy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails notability. I am unable to verify the claims about being "the" (or "a") Egyptian boxing champ or competing in the Olympics qualifications, and I can't find reliable independent sources about him as a writer either. "Theupcomingco" doesn't look like a reliable source, they are "interviews" with standard questions by an obscure site, no actual reporting is done. The other are booksellers and primary sources. Fram (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete: I can't find any evidence of a boxer by that name and the references provided do nothing towards satisfying GNG. – 2 . O . Boxing  15:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Possibly (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * delete and block the creator for WP:UPE. This non-notable person has 0 coverage in independent rs. Praxidicae (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The boxing champion info can't be proved - no evidence. I have even translated the name into arabic, still nothing. This is an obvious notability fail. I also agree with - the user has to be checked for UPE as the articles they develop in the drafts and submit for review are all dedicated to "wanna be on Wikipedia" subjects failing notability guidelines.  Less Unless (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete this is just promo for his print-on-demand books. The claim of notability fails independent verification. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 04:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable as a writer nor as a boxer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.