Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Avner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Amit Avner

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity article from non-notable web developer. His company, BWitty, appears to have done little of substantive value. Any coverage of him/his company relates to the foundation of the company by him at a young age (14) in 1999. TreveXtalk 17:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment This nomination was misfiled at the top and moved to its correct chronological position by Flyguy649talkcontribs 18:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment This article has already been deleted on the Hebrew Wikipedia TreveXtalk 01:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment The Hebrew article lacked a lot of information. This article describes the Internet company that was mentioned in a few newspapers. Should keep it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.178.16.62 (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC).
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete appears to have been created by the person themselves and the deletion tag was removed (most likely by the same person) I dont see an very good claims of notability.--Joebengo 18:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - using single registered account and anon editting to create both his own bio and his companies adver-blog. Rgds, - Trident13 20:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It - Userful data in my opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.56.215.67 (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete verifiability Mukadderat 17:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.