Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Kleinberger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Amit Kleinberger

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Business leader, but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. Can't find enough 3rd party, non-trivial coverage. A few interviews, but nothing substantial. Mikeblas (talk) 03:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 10:02, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as puffery advertorial words for a non-notable CEO of a barely to unlikely notable company itself, I have removed some of the puffery listed at the company article, there's certainly nothing at all convincing how he himself is acceptable for an article when it's all simply showers of company PR. SwisterTwister   talk  20:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many independent reliable sources that cover the subject to a significant extent. Passes WP:GNG. --Mr. Guye (talk) 20:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:BLP requires the sources to be right there in the article - WP:NEXIST is not sufficient. Please detail the sources you believe support your opinion - David Gerard (talk) 21:04, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- The LA Times source offered is a puffed-up article based on the interview with the subject. It's not an acceptable RS for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotion, puff piece of non-notable businessman. Reads like a company press release. Kierzek (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.