Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amita Bajpai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No sources presented that establish notability under WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Amita Bajpai

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Candidate for political office in India. Notability not established in accordance with the topical notability guidelines for politicians or the general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. None of the three sources are significant, one is primary, one does not mention her, and the third merely has her name in a list of candidates. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 00:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Her candidacy was for the Lob Sakha, India's parliament, and she's a member of a party that currently has a couple dozen members of the Lob Sakha, so she's important enough that I declined an A7 speedy tag. I know almost nothing about Indian politics, but I'd guess that there's somewhat of a chance that her candidacy would have spawned some significant coverage.  Nyttend (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:Politician --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * keepi think this page should be kept.this personality is well renowned in bundelkhand area of uttar pradesh,india.below i have found some links which can be helpful.I personally do not want it to be deleted as she is also from royal family and her candidature was for indian parliament and now state legislative assembly.this makes her an important person.media in india is driven by money and she is not a corrupt person perhaps thats why media is not covering her much.it is given in the link below that she does not have a single criminal case..so its very wrong to put it up for deletion.
 * http://www.wisevoter.org/wiki/Amita_Bajpai
 * http://myneta.info/ls2009/candidate.php?candidate_id=3892
 * http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-10-12/lucknow/30270745_1_state-sp-president-sp-supremo-assembly-elections — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheekubaaj (talk • contribs) 15:54, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet the notability requirements of WP:POLITICIAN. It seems she came a distant (but respectable) 3rd place in the election so there's no strong reason to believe there was significant coverage of her. Sources listed above are a brief mention and two listings. Sionk (talk) 23:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.