Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amita Chapra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   09:28, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Amita Chapra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Terrible article, but with cabinet level positions at the state level -- if I understand correctly -- the person would meet WP:POLITICIAN. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Shawn. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Blow it up and start over. Yes, subject is notable but we must not it keep it in present shape. It was created by  which I assume is somehow related to subject of article. To fix the article it needs to be re-written from scratch and preferably by a non-COI person. If you are going to re-write, when done, ping me - I'll change my !vote.  Anup   [Talk]  21:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I've TNT'd it, blown it up, kept the stub as everything else was unreferenced. The subject qualifies on POLITICIAN per sources I've placed within the article. Lourdes  03:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.