Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Borančić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Ammar Borančić


This is an exemplary case of self-promotion by a non-notable person trying to promote themselves through Wikipedia. The person is as marginal as it gets, and fails to fulfill the notability criteria. Sideshow Bob 06:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Also, please take note that this article was created by User:Libero2211, obviously closely acquainted to this person (or quite probably, the person himself), who created or edited only four articles, all related to the Liberal Party of Montenegro, as the username (Libero) suggests. Sideshow Bob 13:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: The subject's main role is confirmed by a brief summary of a recent conference which is reproduced in various media, one of which I have added as a reference. However, being quoted in-role for a party youth organisation is not in itself substantial evidence of encyclopaedic notability. Nor are the subject's other affiliations, including am-dram activity, evidence of notability: fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:ANYBIO. AllyD (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being president of a political party's youth chapter is not an WP:NPOL pass. It can be enough for an article if the person can be reliably sourced as the subject of enough media coverage about him to clear WP:GNG — but it in no way hands him an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing, and this isn't showing anything even approaching the lower bound of enough media coverage about him to clear GNG. Bearcat (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.