Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amnon Evron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, noting also Articles for deletion/Hamburger Evron & Co.. Luna Santin 23:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Amnon Evron

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable lawyer. No verifiable claim of notability. Fails WP:BIO. Edcolins 23:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a memorial, etc. Stifle (talk) 19:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. In some cases a lawyer might be notable, perhaps most commonly by being a defense attorney in a high profile case such as Johnny Cochran. A look through this lawyer's name on Google however revealed no independent media coverage so I cannot see evidence that this lawyer meets the notability threshold. Sjakkalle (Check!)  15:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. He may well have been a fine man, but what made him notable ? Not the supporting charities: that's pretty standard for successful professional people; not his fine professional career: he may well have been a great real estate lawyer, but did he make a contribution to the field that new lawyers will study for the next fifty years ? As always, we need to see evidence that he was notable. Sorry, but this should go. WMMartin 22:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.