Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amod (newspaper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SarahStierch (talk) 16:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Amod (newspaper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Leela Bratee 19:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Um...where's the deletion rationale?  Erpert  Who is this guy? 08:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Woodroar (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:NMEDIA, newspaper was established in 1955, has a significant history. -- Zayeem (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Zayeem. Fai  zan  17:48, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent references.Deb (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Fresh sources added and meets standards of WP:NMEDIA. The newspaper is notable for its long run and special recognition by UNESCO. Crtew (talk) 22:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has a claim of notability, that can be backed up by secondary sources as a successful paper. While the main website is down, the website was terrible to begin with as seen on Archive.org 2007ish. Here is the old about for primary document referencing. Internet presence is lacking, but the majority of sources are offline for sure. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.