Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amol Chawathe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was BJAODN and delete. Mailer Diablo 06:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Amol Chawathe
Non-notable bio. Probably vanity. First version created by User:Amolchawathe was userfied. This version created by user:Aliciaanderson who has edited no other articles. -- RHaworth 00:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "The best software company" was worth a chuckle. Danny Lilithborne 00:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hilarious vanity. Would it be cruel to BJAODN this (since the author appears to be serious)?   dbtfz talk 01:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanity, Orwellian rubbish. - Richardcavell 01:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * yep, BJAODN. Colon el Tom 01:23, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN all the way &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull; CONTRIBUTIONS TALK &bull; EMAIL &bull; 01:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. :-)   dbtfz talk 04:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 03:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence that Fountains Labs is notable. &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 08:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- blue 520  09:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lundse 10:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not important enough. Semperf 12:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no point or usable information in this page --Skiboarder213 21:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing but a sea of red links. StuffOfInterest 18:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.