Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amora Bettany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. H/T EM and MLG for the sources ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 18:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Amora Bettany

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, only an interview. See also Articles for deletion/Pedro Medeiros (her partner) Vexations (talk) 01:08, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. SemiHypercube ✎ 01:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nomination. This person fails WP:BASIC notability guidelines, and I can't find evidence of any significant commentary or independent coverage online at all. Existing links are to trivial coverage and one amateur interview on a small blog. CoronaryKea (talk) 12:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the references are what you would expect for someone doing their job in that field. Nothing rising to WP:GNG.96.127.242.226 (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to fail both WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 20:37, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:15, 27 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep profiled in reliable Brazilian sources, Epoch, Estadao, Folha de S. Paulo, Capricho (published by Editora Abril), and Vice. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Megalibrarygirl (talk). It could be tagged as a stub so the community can help expanding it. Deleting it just or keeping it as a private draft only excludes more users from collaborating with the article. Brunhildr (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep one of a few women game designers in Brazil (or, better, one of a few game designers of any gender in Brazil), worked on notable indie games. Reliable sources in Portuguese DanielGSouza (talk) 02:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I would withdraw the nomination, but that not possible because there are already a number of support votes, but had the sources that are cited now existed when I reviewed the article, I would never have nominated it. The article in Epocha is clearly significant coverage in an independent, reliable source. Vexations (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, apart from all other reliable sources already given, she is also the focus of this long interview in G1 (part of Grupo Globo, which is a very clear indicator of notability. Fram (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.