Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amorpha


 * This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 12:02, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Amorpha
Given this band is still at school, and the best that can be said about them is that they're big in Purbeck, I'd say they're not notable enough for Wikipedia. Good luck and everything, guys, but Wikipedia is not a vanity press. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 19:45, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep new article, obviously. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 21:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * The band may not be notable, but the genus of shrubs certainly is. Keep as revised. Gdr 20:56, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC)
 * Keep genera. Kappa 21:35, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the plants. &#8212; Sesel wa  06:02, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as plant article. Megan1967 06:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep the plant - David Gerard 09:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Its a shame that this perfectly good article on genus will always have the band in its edit history. Keep Dsmdgold 20:15, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as plant article.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 18:23, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.