Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amotz Plessner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Amotz Plessner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Despite having scored "over twenty films and numerous TV shows", and having co-founded a commercial music licensing business, there is scant evidence of any significant independent coverage of Plessner's career. The two citations present (after I deleted the use of another Wikipedia page as a citation) are his own IMDb page and a Facebook page. Google shows me there's not much better available. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:32, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable composer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:21, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Too significant for deletion. Composer of over 30 pictures, most of them television, some of them notable. Haters Back Off is expected to get a lot of exposure too. I suggest adding a discography, though. -Throast (talk) 23:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Your argument sounds a lot like WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. Someone is only "too significant for deletion" if there are actually sources to verify that significance. In this case, that does not appear to be the case.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 02:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:16, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.