Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphenol ICC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. by User:Berean Hunter as WP:G5; Sockpuppet_investigations/Sajithj (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Amphenol ICC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

When an article on this division (not even a company) was created five days ago, it had two problems. It was blatantly promotional, and it did not establish notability. It was deleted as G11. This version has been stripped down so that it is no longer obviously spam, but it doesn't show notability with no references and can't show notability independently of the parent company. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, and as a company that has not been shown to produce anything that is particularly notable, fails WP:MILL.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:13, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A sock puppet investigation says that this article may be made by the same company. So it is WP:PROMO, and of course, the reasons above. Abequinn14 (talk) 01:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.