Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphisbaena (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge into Amphisbaena since there is no consensus to delete the whole content.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Amphisbaena (Dungeons &amp; Dragons)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable gamecruft consisting solely of plot summarization. Recent precedent exists at Articles for deletion/Forsaken (Warcraft) and Articles for deletion/Troll (Warcraft). The only reference is to a magazine published by the game's maker. Tagged orphan for 14 months(!). MER-C 08:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete fancruft. No to-links, no changes. Not needed. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 08:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to the head article on amphisbaena. Where legendary creatures are involved, current fictional incarnations are just as "valid" as fictions from antiquity; and the current version is authoritatively sourced.  I didn't see any plot summaries in the version I read. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Smerdis of Tlön, above. - jc37 20:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Smerdis of Tlön, above.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Amphisbaena. The article is a legitimate stub, but since the creature is (primarily) referenced in legendary contexts outside of D&D, making a separate article for the gaming variant is unwarranted.  It belongs in the main article, under a subheading. Freederick (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Axl (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.