Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amr Awadallah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Amr Awadallah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion for non notable business man. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Article current sources fall short of GNG. Conference bios, database entries, him talking about his company. Restored prod. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.-- Nahal (T) 12:59, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 15:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - I found in depth articles about this man from Bloomberg and Forbes, along with a number of smaller, but reliable sources. I also edited the article to be more neutral, and to flow more naturally. ---   GingeBro  (talk • contribs) 15:44, 17 July 2019 (UTC)  Struck sock. duffbeerforme (talk) 22:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Bloomberg is just a business listing, not in depth coverage. Forbes is a contributor article, not a reliable source. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: GF. Last relist, no prejudice on closure

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 09:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.