Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge with List of Southern Punjab cricketers. Having closed a similar AFD with this result today, applying this result for consistency. Sjakkalle (Check!)  16:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Amrit Lal (1960s Southern Punjab cricketer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  22:33, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  22:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - oddly, most S. Punjab cricketers' articles are substantial in the main. I seem to remember many of these having been set up without me getting to them. Weird that. Other people doing work instead of me. Bobo. 22:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this article is a total failure of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - So used to these happening that I think we've grown tired of !voting these days. Bobo. 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge/redirect to List of Southern Punjab cricketers. Nominally passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability, but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases. wjematherplease leave a message... 11:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per the (slightly) new consensus in Wikipedia that 1 game to meet a project guideline isn't nearly enough when failing all other guidelines. Geschichte (talk) 10:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.