Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrita Jash (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 04:02, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Amrita Jash
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be a stronger claim of notability that at Articles for deletion/Amrita Jash 16 months ago. DMacks (talk) 03:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as before. Citations on GS not remotely enough to pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2019 (UTC).
 * Delete fails WP:PROF, cannot find that her scholarship has had impact.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep It passes WP:PROF. The Pavate Fellow status is highly selective honor. Khasanjim (talk) 01:04, 1 Jun 2019 (UTC)
 * Not a highly selective honor. Just a fellowship. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC).


 * Delete Dismal citation record. A 4-month fellowship does not contribute to notability either. Fails PROF and GNG. --Randykitty (talk) 10:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of passing PROF or GNG. --Tataral (talk) 22:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.