Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amritsar College of Engineering and Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Amritsar College of Engineering and Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Did not find any RS with a BEFORE. Page is an advertisement relying on primary sources, paid sources. Does not satisfy NSCHOOLS/NORG. This is not a degree awarding tertiary institute and has no inherent notability. The creator made exactly one edit and it was the creation of this page. Vikram Vincent 14:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:16, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution (despite bizarre claims above that it isn't), which consensus has been to keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a private institution hence there is no inherent notability. Vikram Vincent 13:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure where you get that from. We have never treated private colleges any differently from public ones. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The guidelines and precedent of past AfDs for private schools that led to delete outcomes are both clear that private schools are not treated any differently then any other type of private organization. Therefore, they don't get a special pass from the notability guidelines. Particularly WP:NORG which is the relevant guideline in this case. Given that, the sourcing clearly isn't there to justify this being a notability organizations. Therefore, the article about it should be delete. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.