Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrop Partnership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 18:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Amrop Partnership

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Coverage is mostly press releases or routine. It does not pass WP:ORGCRIT. MarioGom (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC) Keep the firm is old and notable, the coverage is extensive (especially in books, magazines and newspaper databases), however, the page needs to be expanded with those sources. I've just incorporated comprehensive coverage from a 2005 edition of The Economist. This piece (the Economist) particularly describes how the Amrop Hever (the firm's name at that time) works, uniting nearly 50 companies worldwide working under various local firms, who were previously merged into Amrop Hever global group. --Johnpaul2030 (talk) 08:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC) Keep: I have substantially updated the page with new sources, enhancing its credibility and providing in-depth coverage. These updates include numerous articles from Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, biggest German newspaper (I luckily have access to it), which provides a detailed portrayal of Amrop's history especially in Germany. Additionally, I included sources from Bloomberg, as well as newspapers from Peru, Chile, and other countries, covering Amrop's global impact and raising its notability. Also, the historical depth was added through sources that date back to the company's founding in 1977, including Canadian newspapers from the 1980s accessed through the Quebec National Archive. I think more sources have not been touched and used yet, as in every country, the company works or has worked under various names, and Amrop is only an umbrella name. --DraculaParrot (talk) 13:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Belgium. MarioGom (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is the largest global and European executive search company, and some reliable sources are available - I expanded the Amrop page with two such books/sources. One has stated that Amrop is working as a hybrid executive firm and is the largest one in Europe. Another source identifies it as a major global company, noting its presence in Australia since the 1980s. --Rodgers V (talk) 15:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Keep it in this form. With multiple reliable sources and coverage from the 1980s, 2000s, and including recent ones from across the globe, it stands as a notable entity. --BoraVoro (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.