Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amsterdam International Radio (AIR FM)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Amsterdam International Radio (AIR FM)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seam like non-notable company. Google News search reruns no hits. I can't find any reliable sources that discuss the subject.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – insufficient coverage, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Even if it were notable, it would need WP:TNTing since in its current state it is basically an ad. sst✈(discuss) 01:32, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 01:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. sst✈(discuss) 01:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks any coverage in secondary sources, failing WP:GNG. Article seems to have been created merely to draw attention to a non-notable, startup, and online-only radio station. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Even near speedy material, nothing currently to suggest better yet. SwisterTwister   talk  06:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Online radio stations can get into Wikipedia if they're sourced well enough right off the bat to satisfy WP:GNG, but are not granted any automatic presumption of notability just for existing — and this article, as written, tilts decidedly in the direction of being an advertisement for the station rather than an encyclopedia article about it. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.