Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amusement Time


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete time Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 05:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Amusement Time

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

One of many articles posted by User:Egasa in an apparent astroturfing campaign. Barest assertion of notability, and no secondary independent sources to back up any of these claims. DarkAudit (talk) 00:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Sc straker (talk) 03:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable  MBisanz  talk 05:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep valid stub, requires clean-up not deletion. Catchpole (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no assertion of notability in any of these articles you claim are "valid stubs". There are no reliable, verifiable, and independent sources of any kind. Mere existence is not enough. WP:N and WP:CORP are simply not met. DarkAudit (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, does not assert notability through references or context; appears to be WP:Spam.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete G11 spam and so tagged — Travis talk  02:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.