Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amvona (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Amvona
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Technology company that asserts notability via some large numbers, but fails to demonstrate any significant coverage. The references seem to be made up entirely of trivial mentions and citations, none sufficient to pass WP:ORG. Article seems quite different to the version deleted in a previous AfD, but doesn't demonstrate notability any better. ~ mazca  talk 00:29, 4 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, references in-article are largely trivial coverage, no significant/direct coverage of the company. Aeternitas827 (talk) 07:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.