Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy (1998 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW keep  Questionable nom, plenty of sources found by everyone except the nom. Jclemens (talk) 02:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Amy (1998 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no source cited, none found by searches Oo7565 (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 *  Weak Keep (for now). It's a real film, although it was released in 1997, not 1998 , and we don't seem to have an article on it as it stands.  As a minimum, it needs renaming to Amy (1997 film) . Tevildo (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: it _is_ 1998, after all.  My apologies. Tevildo (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 18:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears notable, covered in reliable sources.  See .  See also, a collection of references on the director, which seems to include several on this movie.   It was reviewed by the New York Times, though inexplicably the review comes from 2001 (perhaps the American release?). .  In other words, it meets and exceeds notability standards.
 * Looks good here. Upgrading my opinion accordingly - remember that the sources need to be in the article, too. Tevildo (talk) 18:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep — Appears to be notable. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Keep The film had a healthy theatrical release . Pastor Theo (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Procedural SPEEDY keep and WP:TROUT to the nom, who had been repeatedly warned about nomming notable subjects and not practicing even the slightest WP:BEFORE. This film had won numerous notable awards] that only need be sourced and added. The AfD is flawed.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.