Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Dillon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, default to keep. Jayjg (talk) 03:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Amy Dillon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-Notable YouTube user a couple of mentions in a newspaper dose not pass N. Also on suggestion of other user.  Kyle  1278  23:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: One of the most fervent deletionists on the project created this article, so I can't imagine the subject isn't notable.--Milowent (talk) 01:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the two decent sources cited in the article, there is this article from the Daily Mirror, and this one from RTÉ.--Michig (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - once again, too few reliable news sources (see ) to prove notability. Bearian (talk) 17:18, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. So what's wrong with the independent reliable sources cited in the article and found by Michig? The fact that they are not indexed by Google News doesn't subtract anything from their reliability. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, I'm generally skeptical about Youtubers, but there does seem to be enough non-trivial coverage in this case for her to pass WP:N. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.