Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Jurgens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice against a redirect to the show &mdash; Coren (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Amy Jurgens

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable fictional character. P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 15:28, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Without coverage in reliable sources, this is nothing but an unnecessary extension of the main article. TTN (talk) 19:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of real world information. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no real world relevance. JuJube (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think we should keep this article due to coverage in reliable sources. --Elisabeth Rogan (talk) 06:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't verify that source because it is behind a subscription wall. Can anyone check and see whether it is non-trivial coverage? Stifle (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: While the source cited does name the character in giving a plot summary, it does not discuss the character in depth. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep in depth is not the criterion. Ask for real world information, you've got it, you still want to delete. DGG (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The NYT article gives no coverage of the character other than a summary of the show. Not significant coverage, so the content should be removed. A redirect to the show is in order. The content is short, and can be reproduced by anyone who has watched the show, so I see no need to keep the history to allow merging. But it's not a huge deal either way. seresin ( ¡? ) 04:01, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Secret Life of the American Teenager. Edward321 (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete & redirect to The Secret Life of the American Teenager, the character isn't notable. RMHED (talk) 23:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.