Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Pence-Brown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 09:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Amy Pence-Brown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Piece appears largely promotional. Most links are not WP:RS. Links describe a FB group/following of less than 1500 people, and "honors" are a small local event with 50 honorees. Would need far more sourcing to meet WP:GNG. JamesG5 (talk) 06:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Re one of the noms below, I didn't speedy this as it's been deleted & recreated repeatedly, and this time around someone else had speedied it & it was declined. Per Wiki rules that means it had to go to AfD.  If it's deleted on consensus this time it should probably be salted. JamesG5 (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 06:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a seemingly promotional article about a person who appears to be failing WP:N. Supporting deletion per WP:DEL-REASON (8) and WP:DEL-REASON (14). Krakkos (talk) 08:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. The article should be speedily deleted using G11 criterion of speedy deletion because it's totally written like a résumé. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 11:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete She doesn't have any significant, in depth coverage aside from local puff/press releases/unreliable sources. Praxidicae (talk) 15:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional article. "Body-image activist." M'kay. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  16:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete subject lacks indpeth coverage to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - per rationale provided by  and  . Celestina007 (talk) 01:08, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.